Why Should We Consider Morally Right Or Wrong - 1167 Words

There have been many debates on what to consider morally right or wrong. These deliberations, however, are largely influenced by our own understanding developed through our cultural backgrounds, the way in which we were raised, as well as the experiences we have gathered over time. Different people have different moral views, but those do not decide what should be right or wrong. Nonetheless, there are actions that can be determined objectively and universally as morally right or wrong, provided that Divine or Natural Law acts as reason to direct these inclination. Natural Law is a system of just principles aligned with that of our nature and God. One such principle is, â€Å"Good is to be done and pursued, and evil is to be avoided,† (Crito, 49d). Even though this principle is divine and universal - because men inclination should be directed by reason- they are not justly hold in common by all humans. One reason for this is that not all humans believe in Natural or Divine Law. They do not believe that there is a code of ethics established that exceeds that of Human Law. Even though, the content of Human Law emphasizes this principle. For example, if one commits murder, they will be prosecuted. Moreover, there are some people who do recognize the existence of a Divine Law, but are unaware of whether it applies to them, or they are blinded by societal mores. This is why in Martin Luther King Jr.’s â€Å"Letter,† he points out the importance of the thermometer and the thermostat. ThisShow MoreRelatedThe Moral Philosophy Of Th e Mercedes Benz Executive Christoph Von Hugo Essay1523 Words   |  7 Pagesoptions. In this paper, I will describe Jeremy Bentham’s moral philosophy of utilitarianism and why he would be in support of this statement; I will also briefly explain Emanuel Kant’s moral theory and why he would be in support of this statement as well. First I will start by explaining Bentham’s version of utilitarianism. This view of morality is based on the principle of utility, the idea that an act is right when it maximizes happiness and minimizes suffering. According to Bentham, â€Å"Nature has placedRead MorePractical Ethics, By Peter Singer, The Modern Bioethical Philosopher1469 Words   |  6 PagesAny Topic (writer s Choice) Practical Ethics Introduction Practical Ethics is a book by Peter Singer, the modern bioethical philosopher. It analyzes how and the reasons as to why beings’ interests should be weighted. According to Singer, a being’s interest should be weighted on the basis of the properties of the being and never on the basis of its affiliation to some abstract group (Peter n.p). The book studies a wide array of ethical issues including abortion, sex, race, ability, infanticide, politicalRead MoreEssay on Contrasting Kand and Hume on Morality1510 Words   |  7 Pagesreasoned, therefore the moral worth of an action is determined by its motives and not by its consequences. Exploring the works of Hume (1738) and Kant(1785) on morality and ethics, we will ask the question whether we should do what is morally right, even when you could profit by doing something wrong, and furthermore, we shall discuss morality as a type of game, yet something you cannot opt out of, as something Foot describes as inescapable. (Foot 1972: 311). Morality and its standards are oftenRead MoreWhy abortion is morally wrong1412 Words   |  6 Pagesit, abortion is morally wrong. Although that should not be misinterpreted for a pro-life stance on abortion because there are numerous circumstances that must be considered in each situation. Just because abortion is morally impermissible, it does not mean that society will deem you a bad person for getting an abortion under extreme circumstances. For that reason, abortion is a specifically tricky topic to discuss. There is no clear-cut answer as to whether or not abortion should be allowed and becauseRead MoreAn Intrinsic Value Of Mine1364 Words   |  6 Pagesthat you consider intrinsically valuable. Name three things that are instrumentally valuable. In my life I consider happiness and kindness intrinsically valuable. For something to be intrinsically valuable it is said that, that something must be â€Å"valuable because they are what they are, without being a means to something else† (Vaughn 6). I find kindness to be an intrinsic value of mine because I believe that being kind to others is something that you should always do and a value that should be universallyRead MoreThree Kinds of Relativism1309 Words   |  5 Pagespart of the course, we studied different forms of relativism and how they can be applied to morality. Relativism is in contrast to the universal laws that we studied when we were studying Kant’s Groundwork earlier in the semester. Instead, relativism makes the claim that there are no universal laws that can be applied to morality because every point of view is equally valid and therefore nothing can be said to be morally right or wrong. What we perceive to be right or wrong is based on our ownR ead MoreEthical Relativism And The Norms Of One s Culture807 Words   |  4 PagesEthical relativism is the theory that holds morality relative to the norms of one s culture. Meaning, whether an action is right or wrong will depend on the moral norms of that society in which you reside. Though some actions may be viewed right in one society, it does not mean it will be morally right in another. I take the view of an ethical relativist, where there is no universal moral standards. I believe this because morality is constantly changing. Society’s beliefs, values and ideas areRead MoreThe Is Not An Action Is Ethically Right Or Wrong?1124 Words   |  5 Pagessimilarities. Given these scenarios, do we as human beings truly have the privilege to pass our judgements on other cultures? Judgements in regards to what is ethically right and wrong or what is different, culturally. Not being permitted to judge the practices of another culture and only being permitted to allow other c ultures to progress and practice as they please is the common belief known as cultural relativism. Should whether or not an action is ethically right or wrong be only determined by that cultureRead MoreLoyalty Within A Group Of People839 Words   |  4 Pagessteps of a group of people let alone a person who is morally wrong and keep your loyalty to them although others are ignoring their immoral misconduct? Well point in case with an excessive compliance to their leader Hitler, whom convinced Germans they were part of a new group of people, which led to the massacre of millions of innocent and Jewish people. As a consequence of their loyalty To their job and tasks at hand no matter how morally wrong they knew they were, clearly keeping their loyalty wasRead MoreThesis: If The Law Does Not Breach Person A’S Moral Code,1388 Words   |  6 Pagesbeing (weighing the potential consequences), it is morally wrong for person A to knowingly violate the laws of country C. If [Conditi ons] are not met, then it is morally permissible. Part One: I’d like to examine my thesis in parts. First, If a law were to breach person A’s moral code, the law itself would go against what person A reasonably believes to be the right thing to do. For the purpose of my thesis, I want to consider that person A is a morally sound individual and at least in part, most of